Wednesday, December 12, 2007
How to evacuate a building
Step 2: Forget to check the temperature of the oven, and fail to notice it is set for 160 degrees C.
Step 3: Walk away.
Step 4: Notice that the entire lab fills up with smoke so thick that you cannot see from one end to the other.
Step 5: Attempt to put out smoke with fire extinguisher and watch helplessly as it continues to flare up.
Step 6: Call security.
Step 7: Evacuate building and watch as 11 fire engine trucks and one hazmat team arrives on site.
Step 8: Finally realize to pull fire alarm to evacuate remaining refugees in the building.
Step 9: Stand around and wait for fire rescue team to declare the building safe.
What is most embarrassing is that this entire incident was caused by negligence of a graduate student, not a (typically stupid) undergrad.
(not me, of course)
Sunday, December 2, 2007
Menu for those who are sick
Starting with a quart of chicken stock, add 1/2 cup of rice and bring to a simmer. Add 2-3 slices of ginger and a handful of dried scallops (rehydrated in hot water). Simmer below boiling for 1.5 hours.
Poached fish
Bring a big pot of water to boil. Add some coriander seeds, parsley, bay leaf, thyme, ginger and 3 garlic cloves, simmer for 30 minutes. Add fish filets and poach gently for 5 minutes.
Mix in 1 diced century egg to porridge before serving. Place 1 filet atop porridge, top with grated ginger, diced scallions and a drizzle of sesame oil.
Enjoy with happy tummy.
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
What God?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is always a God. It is just whether it is the God in the bible. Or the Cai-shen who will bring in lots of $$$ into the country.
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
hmph
Broji: Are you or Bibji coming home next year?
Fibji: I don't know. Wassup? You miss us?
Broji: Oh, I want to buy another book next year and it is cheaper to hand carry.
Fibji: .............................................................................................
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
Why UGs are annoying
Sunday, October 28, 2007
Tortoise shapes evolved to avoid 'turning turtle'
* NewScientist.com news service
FOR a tortoise, being upside down is at best ignominious and at worst fatal. So to avoid it, some species have evolved a quite brilliant trick - perfectly shaped self-righting shells.
Gabor Domokos and Peter Varkonyi at the Budapest University of Technology and Economics in Hungary modelled the geometry of turtle and tortoise shells of differing dome heights. Those with very tall domes, such as the star tortoise, effectively have just one stable orientation, right side up. Put another way, a star tortoise placed on its back will automatically roll back onto its front, righting itself with little effort.
In geometric terms, this tortoise's shell is known as a monostatic object, one that has only one stable way of resting on a horizontal surface. Such shapes are incredibly rare in nature, the researchers say.
Other, flatter species, such as the Argentine snake-necked turtle, have two stable points - on their belly and their back - and must use their neck as a lever to flip themselves back over. Animals with medium height domes have the worst shape of all, say the researchers. They can come to rest at three distinct points, right side up and on either side of the shell, meaning they can get stuck halfway through a roll (Proceedings of the Royal Society B, DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1188).
From issue 2627 of New Scientist magazine, 28 October 2007, page 22
Thursday, October 18, 2007
Thursday, October 4, 2007
Sigh
By JOSEPH BERGER
Correction Appended
PRINCETON, N.J.
Many of us have known this scholar: The hair is well-streaked with gray, the chin has begun to sag, but still our tortured friend slaves away at a masterwork intended to change the course of civilization that everyone else just hopes will finally get a career under way.
We even have a name for this sometimes pitied species — the A.B.D. — All But Dissertation. But in academia these days, that person is less a subject of ridicule than of soul-searching about what can done to shorten the time, sometimes much of a lifetime, it takes for so many graduate students to, well, graduate. The Council of Graduate Schools, representing 480 universities in the United States and Canada, is halfway through a seven-year project to explore ways of speeding up the ordeal.
For those who attempt it, the doctoral dissertation can loom on the horizon like Everest, gleaming invitingly as a challenge but often turning into a masochistic exercise once the ascent is begun. The average student takes 8.2 years to get a Ph.D.; in education, that figure surpasses 13 years. Fifty percent of students drop out along the way, with dissertations the major stumbling block. At commencement, the typical doctoral holder is 33, an age when peers are well along in their professions, and 12 percent of graduates are saddled with more than $50,000 in debt.
These statistics, compiled by the National Science Foundation and other government agencies by studying the 43,354 doctoral recipients of 2005, were even worse a few years ago. Now, universities are setting stricter timelines and demanding that faculty advisers meet regularly with protégés. Most science programs allow students to submit three research papers rather than a single grand work. More universities find ways to ease financial burdens, providing better paid teaching assistantships as well as tuition waivers. And more universities are setting up writing groups so that students feel less alone cobbling together a thesis.
Fighting these trends, and stretching out the process, is the increased competition for jobs and research grants; in fields like English where faculty vacancies are scarce, students realize they must come up with original, significant topics. Nevertheless, education researchers like Barbara E. Lovitts, who has written a new book urging professors to clarify what they expect in dissertations; for example, to point out that professors “view the dissertation as a training exercise” and that students should stop trying for “a degree of perfection that’s unnecessary and unobtainable.”
There are probably few universities that nudge students out the door as rapidly as Princeton, where a humanities student now averages 6.4 years compared with 7.5 in 2003. That is largely because Princeton guarantees financial support for its more than 2,000 scholars for five years, including free tuition and stipends that range up to $30,000 a year. That means students need teach no more than two courses during their schooling and can focus on research.
“Princeton since the 1930s has felt that a Ph.D. should be an education, not a career, and has valued a tight program,” said William B. Russel, dean of the graduate school.
And students are grateful. “Every morning I wake up and remind myself the university is paying me to do nothing but write the dissertation,” said Kellam Conover, 26, a classicist who expects to complete his course of study in five years next May when he finishes his dissertation on bribery in Athens. “It’s a tremendous advantage compared to having to work during the day and complete the dissertation part time.”
But fewer than a dozen universities have endowments or sources of financing large enough to afford five-year packages. The rest require students to teach regularly. Compare Princetonians with Brian Gatten, 28, an English scholar at the University of Texas in Austin. He has either been teaching or assisting in two courses every semester for five years.
“Universities need us as cheap labor to teach their undergraduates, and frankly we need to be needed because there isn’t another way for us to fund our education,” he said.
That raises a question that state legislatures and trustees might ponder: Would it be more cost effective to provide financing to speed graduate students into careers rather than having them drag out their apprenticeships?
But money is not the only reason Princeton does well. It has developed a culture where professors keep after students. Students talk of frequent meetings with advisers, not a semiannual review. For example, Ning Wu, 30, a father of two, works in Dr. Russel’s chemical engineering lab and said Dr. Russel comes by every Friday to discuss Mr. Wu’s work on polymer films used in computer chips. He aims to get his Ph.D. next year, his fifth.
While Dr. Russel values “the critical thinking and independent digging students have to do, either in their mind for an original concept or in the archives,” others question the necessity of book-length works. Some universities have established what they call professional doctorates for students who plan careers more as practitioners than scholars. Since the 1970s, Yeshiva University has not only offered a Ph.D. in psychology but also a separate doctor of psychology degree, or Psy.D., for those more interested in clinical work than research; that program requires a more modest research paper.
OTHER institutions are reviving master’s degree programs for, say, aspiring scientists who plan careers in development of products rather than research.
Those who insist on dissertations are aware that they must reduce the loneliness that defeats so many scholars. Gregory Nicholson, completing his sixth and final year at Michigan State, was able to finish a 270-page dissertation on spatial environments in novels like Kerouac’s “On the Road” with relative efficiency because of a writing group where he thrashed out his work with other thesis writers.
“It’s easy, especially in our field, to feel isolated, and that tends to slow people down,” he said. “There’s no sense of belonging to an academic community.”
Some common sense would also hasten the process. The dissertation is a hurdle that must be cleared, not a magnum opus, the capstone of a career. Princeton’s Mr. Wu has made that calculation.
“You do not want to stay forever,” Mr. Wu said. “It’s a training process.”
E-mail: joeberg@nytimes.com
Correction: October 4, 2007
The On Education column yesterday, about efforts to shorten the time it takes to earn a Ph.D., misstated the number of graduate students at Princeton University. There are more than 2,000 — not 330, the number of Ph.D degrees the university awarded last year.
Sunday, September 30, 2007
Wednesday, September 19, 2007
Tuesday, September 18, 2007
Thursday, September 6, 2007
I never notice there is a function "why"
Bill obeyed the very young good engineer.
>> why
Because a terrified programmer wanted it.
>> why
The not excessively young programmer wanted it that way.
>> why
Barney told a not very terrified and smart and terrified and bald and bald and tall and tall and young and rich and not excessively terrified and tall and not very bald and not excessively tall and not very terrified and very smart and rich and good and very tall and young kid.
>> why
To please some bald mathematician.
>> why
He obeyed some system manager.
>> why
Because I obeyed the terrified not excessively rich kid.
>> why
To fool all.
>> why
It should be obvious.
>> why
It's your karma.
>> why
Pete obeyed him.
>> why
Joe knew it was a good idea.
>> why
I wanted it that way.
>> why
Because the rich mathematician suggested it.
>> why
You insisted on it.
>> why
Some terrified mathematician helped a tall and young and rich and good and young and rich and young and very rich and smart and very good and rich hamster.
>> why
Pete obeyed some smart engineer.
>> why
For the approval from me.
>> why
Because some programmer insisted on it.
>> why
To fool all.
>> why
A smart programmer wanted it.
>> why
They knew it was a good idea.
>> why
Loren suggested it.
>> why
For the approval from Barney.
>> why
A terrified and good and tall and good and tall and bald kid wanted it that way.
>> why
I suggested it.
>> why
Loren insisted on it.
>> why
Barney suggested it.
>> why
Pete told me to.
>> why
The hamster obeyed some tall kid.
>> why
You told me to.
>> why
Jack wanted it.
>> why
A kid insisted on it.
>> why
I knew it was a good idea.
>> why
To please some hamster.
>> why
For the approval from some terrified and rich kid.
>> why
A hamster obeyed a not excessively terrified and rich kid.
>> why
How should I know?
>> why
Because Pete suggested it.
>> why
In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth...
>> why
It's your karma.
>> help why
WHY Provides succinct answers to almost any question.
WHY, by itself, provides a random answer.
WHY(N) provides the N-th answer.
Please embellish or modify this function to suit your own tastes.
Monday, August 27, 2007
I hate Mondays..
Side remark: ttw and i managed to get a huge ass Sharp 32US50B TV from my car into the living room on Sat somehow...
On Sun, we went to Joe's Noodle House for some serious Szechuan food.. I think ttw is still suffering from the mala-ness now..
Friday, August 24, 2007
That means Cecilia in PhD comics is exactly the same age as I am.
Hur hur. I wonder if it means that I am as smart and capable a grad student. :D
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
Irish Food
Queen of Tarts
Oliver St John Gogarty
The Little Skillet
Floury Hands
Steps of Rome (Italian, but easily the best non thincrust pizza I ever had)
McGann's Pub
Tigh an t-Saorsaigh
Monday, August 20, 2007
For the best ice cream...
Mmm, Mint Julep. Mmm, Chocolate Whiskey, mmm, Coffee Kahlua.
Mmmm, Aztec hot chocolate.
Tuesday, July 31, 2007
Cheap joke from Roman, Courtesy of G-man
Apple Computer announced today that it has developed a computer chip that can store and play high fidelity music in women's breast implants. The iTit will cost $499 or $599 depending on speaker size. This is considered to be a major breakthrough, because women have long complained about men staring at their breasts and not listening to them.
Monday, July 23, 2007
Friday, July 20, 2007
Mind-boggling
*ring ring*
ttw: Hallo, xxx lab.
boss: hey ttw, I wanted to ask you, do you know how to spell "repertoire"?
ttw: err... .wha..?
boss: you know, like a collection of things...
ttw: R-E-P-E-R-T-O-I-R-E?
boss: oh, ok. thanks. bye.
*dial tone*
WHAT. The. --___--
Thursday, July 19, 2007
Someone tell me...
Monday, July 16, 2007
Thursday, July 12, 2007
I originally thought that this was an article to warn people of a potential health hazard with the popular device. However after reading it, I realized it is an article to warn people of the potentially hazardous STUPIDITY OF OTHER PEOPLE AROUND THEM:
"The Canadian jogger suffered worse injuries, according to a report in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine.
The man, a 39-year-old dentist from the Vancouver area, was listening to an iPod while jogging in a thunderstorm when, according to witnesses, lightning hit a tree a couple of feet away and jumped to his body. The strike threw the man about eight feet and caused second-degree burns on his chest and left leg."
Sometimes the advances in modern medicine piss me off. For example, by keeping IDIOTS LIKE THESE ALIVE.
Tuesday, July 10, 2007
Sunday, July 8, 2007
Erm
Friday, July 6, 2007
Down in the Boondocks
My trusty GSM phone is on roaming mode @@. But apparently, there is no charge for it. And I found that GPRS still works! So I am still connected to the outside world. Hee.
Thursday, July 5, 2007
Apple buyers
By KATIE HAFNER
SAN FRANCISCO, July 5 — David Flashner thought he had it wired: buy two iPhones last Friday when they first went on sale, keep one and sell the other at a profit so big it would pay for most of the first one.
Mr. Flashner wasted no time. He began advertising the extra phone while still in line at an Apple store in Burlingame, Calif., south of San Francisco. During his 21-hour wait, he posted half a dozen different ads to Craigslist — with prices ranging from $800 to $1,200 — and waited for the calls to come in.
But no calls came because consumers expect that stores will soon have phones in stock. He continued to advertise the extra phone through the weekend, and ended up with just one call, which went nowhere. On Wednesday, he returned the phone.
Mr. Flashner, 25, who manages an audio-visual equipment rental company, is not the only would-be iPhone reseller whose plan failed to follow the script. “I haven’t heard of a single person who sold one,” he said.
Across the nation, people looking to make a quick and easy profit bought one, two or as many phones as they could by recruiting friends to stand in line with them. Many of them were the first to get in line, camping overnight outside the stores. But now they are finding that the iPhone is much more like a Harry Potter book than a hard-to-find Wii video game machine: a great thing to be one of the first to own, but not high in resale value because supply is not constrained.
Last Friday, just after the first iPhones were sold, thousands of listings showed up on eBay and Craigslist, with prices of $1,000 for the 8-gigabyte phone, a $400 markup. Some bold sellers were asking $2,000. But as it became clear that supply was meeting demand, they found themselves stuck. Few of the phones have sold for more than $700, which after sales tax, is not a remarkable profit margin.
Corey Spring, a blogger at newsvine.com who analyzed eBay auctions, estimated that a significant number of sellers “were only making their money back, even closing at a loss.” Most Apple stores in the United States have no phones available, but the most determined customers seem to have been able to buy a phone. Few people seem willing to pay even $100 over the retail price.
Some frustrated resellers say they will keep trying, then return their extra phone or phones within the 14-day return period.
D. J. Ostrowski is typical. Mr. Ostrowski, a 20-year-old college student who lives in Carol Stream, Ill., a suburb of Chicago, stood in line “in the hot sun” outside an Apple Store for nine hours and talked a friend into joining him.
Like other resellers, Mr. Ostrowski was hoping the iPhone demand would duplicate the Xbox, PlayStation and Wii crazes. Lines are still long for the Wii gaming console, because Nintendo misjudged demand. Devices sell on eBay for around $100 more than the $250 retail price. In his ad, Mr. Ostrowski offered to “rendezvous anywhere,” or even deliver the phone. The only call he got was from another unsuccessful reseller, asking if he had had any luck.
Mr. Ostrowski had used a day off from his job at a hookah bar to stand in line. Now, he said, after factoring in the money he spent on gas and the waste of a free day, he views the entire venture as a net loss. “I’m probably better off getting a side job,” he said.
A few people got lucky. Trevor Lyman, 21, a senior at Temple University in Philadelphia, sold an 8-gigabyte phone on eBay for $1,300 while waiting in line Friday afternoon to buy it. But he has three more he is trying to unload, with no success so far.
Demand for the phone was remarkably strong in the first days. Analysts estimate that Apple and AT&T stores have sold around 500,000 phones so far. One analyst ventured a guess as high as 700,000. But Apple appears to have anticipated demand and contracted with manufacturers in Asia to build far more. Apple has said it expects to sell as many as 10 million phones by the end of 2008.
Over the last few weeks, Apple stirred a great deal of speculation about inventory levels by shrouding them in secrecy. As a result, resellers decided to take a chance. The company declined to comment on the rush to resell the phones, and on the status of iPhone inventories. The Apple Web page that had listed the phone’s availability last weekend at stores across the country no longer shows the row of red (for no) and green (for yes) lights. It says: “Please check back after 9:00 p.m. for tomorrow’s status. After your local store closes, we determine iPhone availability for the following day.” Only two Apple stores were listed as having phones available Thursday: Tigard, Ore., and the Shadyside neighborhood of Pittsburgh.
Jim Fazio, 41, an entrepreneur in Fort Collins, Colo., said he had seen people make huge profits off the PlayStation 3 last Christmas and decided to jump into the iPhone market.
“I took a chance that the prerelease hype would create a supply-demand imbalance, but obviously that scenario didn’t play out this time,” said Mr. Fazio, who advertised his iPhone on eBay for $1,200. “I pity the poor goobers that camped for these things.”
On Tuesday, when Mr. Fazio failed to sell his phone at a reduced price of $850, he took the phone back to the Apple store, which was out of 8-gigabyte phones. The instant he returned it, another customer in the store bought it.
“It’s a lot easier with tickets,” said Aron Honig, a 23-year-old equity research analyst who lives in Boston and has had more success selling Yankees and Red Sox tickets. Mr. Honig bought one 4-gigabyte phone and advertised it for $700 on both eBay and Craigslist, but heard only from people he assumed were scam artists, offering to wire him the money. “I think it’s the last time I’m going to do any kind of electronics product,” he said.
Some resellers are amused, if not wealthier. Jack Boyce, 62, a graphic designer in Boston, bought two 8-gigabyte phones last Friday, after waiting four and a half hours in line. Mr. Boyce took his computer with him and was able to do a little work. He charges clients $100 an hour and calculates that he lost three and a half out of four billable hours.
Still, Mr. Boyce said, he “had a ball” waiting outside the Apple store in Cambridge. “The people around me were wonderful,” he said. “We took pictures of each other.”
And he remains optimistic that someone might still pay him $950 for his extra phone, pointing out that only a few Apple stores have iPhones in stock, and none of the AT&T stores do. “So my wish may be coming true,” he said.
Monday, July 2, 2007
On Wimbledon
B: oh
B: hahhaha
B: i read that as
B: "venus almost lost a nipple"
B: hahahhahahha
Tuesday, June 26, 2007
hahaha
They should make one for all the SUV and big cars drivers too.
The series of TV ads shows women shaking their little finger - a gesture used to symbolise a small penis - as speeding male motorists race past.
The $A1.9m (£805,400, US$1.6m) campaign aims to make speeding socially unacceptable among young drivers.
The "Speeding. No-one Thinks Big of You" campaign will run on TV, in cinemas, at bus shelters and online.
The shock tactics of previous adverts that showed disturbing images of death and injury in road crashes have not worked, says the New South Wales state government authority behind the ads, the Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA).
Exposure to "computer games, modern media ... and horror films" had desensitised many young males to the violent images of those campaigns, RTA spokesman John Whelan told the Sydney Morning Herald newspaper.
The new ads include one young driver revving his engine and rushing through traffic lights in front of two young women and another racing past a female pedestrian.
After both incidents the women wave their little fingers in slow motion with knowing glances.
"We will do what we feel we have to, to get the message through," Mr Whelan said.
Speeding is a factor in about 40% of road deaths in NSW each year, according to RTA figures.
The ad campaign coincides with the introduction of new restrictions on learner drivers, including a ban on all mobile phone use, limits on the number of young passengers allowed and tougher speeding penalties.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/asia-pacific/6240288.stm
Thursday, June 21, 2007
:)
This means
1) I get to sponge off her. Sponge sponge
2) No Benji for me. :( I like Benji. He is a cutie.
Reporting from the conference
except maybe back home when they count the number of random publications.
2) Two of the biggest names in the field came together with a young scientist and asked me to present my work. In the middle, the Bossman walked by, stopped and smiled. I got tense and @_@. One of the big names chased the Boss away. Shoo.
Heh. I hope they don't think I am a moron, considering the ideas they worked on are cooler.
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
Hee
Your filtering method is wrong because it smooths all out the noise. If I have a data point that is very different, you are discarding it.
-__- Hello. Isn't that the entire point of filtering, to capture the global structure? And, it is retarded to look at just 1 data point. You should be considering the curve, especially if your modality suffers from noise.
2) I am trying to make my poster to read "screw you bitch" in photos, and only in photos. Any ideas?
3) I am too cheap to exchange my drink coupon for a coke, and got a gin and tonic instead. That didn't go too well.
4) As it turns out, Benji will be staying a West Coast dog. He is not coming to be a "bang bang dawg"
Monday, June 18, 2007
3 steps of attending a conference
2. During final version submission, double the Boss's last name, ie John Smith Smith, instead of John Smith
3. During registration, misspell the School's name.
Thursday, June 7, 2007
Vol. 316. no. 5830, p. 1405
DOI: 10.1126/science.316.5830.1405
News of the Week
ACADEMIC TENURE:
MIT Colleague Quits to Protest Sherley Dismissal
The head of a biomedical innovation center at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge has resigned to protest the school's treatment of an African-American colleague in the biological engineering department. Frank Douglas, who is also black, says he will leave MIT on 30 June--the termination date for his colleague, James Sherley. An MIT spokesperson says that Douglas's decision would have no impact on the institution's stance regarding Sherley, who went on a 12-day hunger strike in February after being denied tenure (Science, 16 February, p. 920).A stem cell researcher and the winner of a 2006 Director's Pioneer Award from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Sherley began a fast on 5 February to fight what he claims was a racist decision by MIT to reject his bid for tenure. MIT says that race played no role in the decision. When Sherley ended his strike, MIT put out a statement expressing a commitment to address his concerns about fairness and to "continue to work toward resolution of our differences with Professor Sherley." In the weeks that followed, however, MIT administrators made it clear that they would neither reopen Sherley's tenure case nor review how his grievances had been handled.
Douglas is a chemist and pharmaceutical industry veteran who was hired in 2005 to establish MIT's Center for Biomedical Innovation. He holds faculty appointments in the science, engineering, and management schools. In a 1 June letter to MIT Associate Provost Claude Canizares, Douglas expressed dismay that MIT, "after having agreed to arbitration, which led to Prof. Sherley ending his hunger strike, now, has negated that agreement and insists on his departure on June 30th, 2007. … I leave because I would neither be able to advise young Blacks about their prospects of flourishing in the current environment, nor about avenues available to effect change when agreements or promises are transgressed."
Douglas says he has no opinion on whether Sherley deserved tenure but is frustrated by MIT's "lack of desire" to resolve the issue. "Does the institution really believe that Prof. Sherley would have ended his hunger strike if he really understood that 'continue(ing) to work towards resolution of differences' meant no arbitration process and a pre-agreement that he should leave regardless of the outcome of the resolution of those differences?," he asks, saying that as a minority, he felt obligated to speak out.
In a 3 June reply to Douglas, Canizares wrote, "I can state categorically that MIT did not agree, implicitly or explicitly, to arbitration or to extend Professor Sherley's faculty appointment beyond June 30." The next day, MIT issued a statement saying that Douglas's decision was based on inaccurate information, and that it hoped he would reconsider his resignation.
Outsiders familiar with MIT's environment do not think Douglas's departure will have much impact. "The administration is inclined to take the same approach that governments take while dealing with terrorists: They won't negotiate," says Philip Phillips, an African-American solid state physicist at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, who was denied tenure at MIT 16 years ago. Instead, he predicts, MIT will treat Douglas as it did Sherley--"as just another irrational person."
Wednesday, June 6, 2007
Ouch
"The fact that for blah blah, one can factorize the blah blah matrix from the eigenvalue decomposition is also well known. For instance, it can be found as a homework problem in courses taught by Prof. A andB
2003: problem 3 of homework 5 at url of Prof A's course
2006: problem 4 of homework 5 at url of Prof B's course"
Tuesday, June 5, 2007
Heh heh
Broad Impact: Refreshing your statistics knowledge
Five Faculty of 1000 Biology members have recently singled out an Exceptional Broad Impact paper that is of high relevance to researchers in all fields of Biology, as it provides guidance to biologists for navigating the often tricky world of data representation -- in particular the use of error bars.
"This paper should be read by anyone who is trying to present experimental data graphically." comments David Stephens (University of Bristol, UK), Faculty of 1000 Biology member for Cell Biology.
Andy Groves (House Ear Institute, USA), a Faculty of 1000 Biology member for Developmental Biology goes on to say "This wonderful article clearly explains how experimental variation is measured and displayed, and describes how different kinds of error bars can mean very different things. This paper is a must read for every scientist who thinks that triplicate plates from a single experiment counts as n=3 !!!!!"
"Personally, I have filed the pdf in a safe place, and I plan to consult it every time I send a graph for publication." concludes Etienne Joly (CNRS, France), a Faculty of 1000 Biology Member for Immunology.
Friday, June 1, 2007
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
Today,
2) Trip to dentist= Ouch. Pain. Swelling.
Monday, May 28, 2007
Saturday, May 26, 2007
Thursday, May 24, 2007
Just so that I don't forget the songs again,
LEN: Steal My Sunshine
Summer 1999: AA the whole time. fun. art fair. thermodynamics. linear algebra. tech comms. intro to world politics. dsp (funny, even I forgot about this. this should be top off the list). DC for 1 week.
It is 8 years ago! Holy cow
On the torture show
B: huh. What??
B: like an audience????
A: yeah
B: so D is a dolphin?
A: lol
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
-__-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
A wireless felony
Updated: May 22, 2007 11:54 AM
By PATRICK CENTER
SPARTA -- It's a lunch hour ritual at the Re-Union Street Café. Customers regularly log onto the internet using the café's wireless network to check their e-mail and surf the web while they enjoy the coffee and ambience.
Sam Peterson II did the same thing. "I knew that the Union Street had WiFi," he told 24 Hour News 8. "I just went down and checked my e-mail and didn't see a problem with that."
But Peterson did it everyday, and from his car. He drove up, parked, and piggybacked onto the Union Street network.
Piggybacking - using someone else's WiFi without their permission - isn't legal. Sparta Police Chief Andrew Milanowski was suspicious of what Peterson was doing in his car every day and talked with him.
He didn't issue a ticket, but he did hit the books. "I had a feeling a law was being broken," the chief said, "but I didn't know exactly what." He found a relatively new and rarely used law. "Unauthorized use of computer access," he said.
Michigan lawmakers put it on the books in 1979 to protect the public from computer hackers. It was revised in 2000 to include the protection of WiFi systems. Under Michigan law, access a computer system without authorization and you're committing a crime.
A warrant was sworn for Peterson's arrest on a "five year felony, $10,000 fine," he said. "I would have never guessed."
Milanowski doesn't believe Peterson knew he was breaking the law. "In my opinion, probably not. Most people probably don't."
Neither did the coffee shop owner Donna May. "I didn't know it was really illegal, either," she told 24 Hour News 8. "If he would have come in (to the coffee shop) it would have been fine."
Kent County Assistant Prosecutor Lynn Hopkins said, "This is the first time that we've actually charged it," and it could be the only case of its kind in the state. "Oh, we'd been hoping to dodge this bullet for a while. We had not been looking for this," she said. "We knew it would come up eventually and we'd have to make a decision as to how to deal with it."
24 Hour News 8 investigated the number of prosecutions - and found only a handful of WiFi freeloaders prosecuted worldwide.
But it was inevitable with all the hotspots and businesses providing WiFi access. In the US alone, an estimated 16 million homes are now equipped.
The only way to catch a piggybacker is to catch someone, like Peterson, in the act "because 90 percent of the time we wouldn't know, frankly, that it's going on," Hopkins said.
New York's Westchester County is trying a different tack. Their local government said it's up to WiFi subscribers to protect themselves against piggybackers. Businesses were told to secure their networks or pay a fine.
Hopkins doesn't agree with that tactic. "It's the same attitude of somehow the victim's responsible for preventing the crime, and that's not the approach that our justice system takes."
Increasing security awareness isn't a bad idea, though. Some argue WiFi is a broadcast and the airwaves are open to the public.
In a February 2007 Target 8 Investigation, a drive through city streets exposed vulnerable WiFi hookups, available to anyone looking to surf the web or check their e-mail.
As a first-time offender without a prior record, the Kent County prosecutor's office decided not to charge Peterson with a felony. Instead, he'll be enrolled in the county's diversion program.
He'll pay a $400 fine and do 40 hours of community service, but it will not go on his record.
The prosecutor's offices said not everyone who gets caught breaking the law will be given this option. Offenders will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
The next time you're tempted, though, think of Sam Peterson. "People need to know that this isn't legal and if you get caught there are some pretty serious consequences."
Godfather
B: and ?
A: then I said, I been thinking.. but then B also dunno yet.. it is strange if B dunno and I say I know
A: heee :p
B: DID YOU ACTUALLY SAY THAT
A: yes I did
B: DIDNT HE ><>
A: he laughed and said so B is the godfather?
B: man now im the godfather
B: R is the don
A: yeah
A: brandon marlo
B: marlon brando
B: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wednesday, May 16, 2007
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Erm?
"Under federal law, 65,000 H-1B visas are available each year for workers in specialty fields such as computer programmers, engineers, architects, accountants, doctors, college professors and fashion models."
I didn't know the geeky look is the latest fashion fad.
Monday, May 14, 2007
The Ben has Landed!
Thursday, May 10, 2007
Wednesday, May 9, 2007
Philly Cheese Steak
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheesesteak"In the 2004 presidential campaign, candidate John Kerry, on a visit to Pat's Steaks in South Philadelphia, committed the faux pas of ordering a cheesesteak with Swiss cheese. According to the Philadelphia Daily News, "reporters snickered," because "in Philadelphia, ordering Swiss on a cheesesteak is like rooting for Dallas at an Eagles game. It isn't just politically incorrect; it could get you a poke in the nose."
Oops.
Thursday, May 3, 2007
On the concept of food
A: hee hee
B: no, where
A: nyt
B: where got duck penises
B: where where
A:http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/01/science/01duck.html?ex=1335931200&en=85332ad7a98f7709&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink
B: oh. it is under Science? I checked under Dining & Wine
B: heeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. HEEHEEHEHEH
A: -_-
A: WHAT IS WRONG WITH U
Tuesday, May 1, 2007
You know your life is pathetic when..
"IEEE PDF eXpress: File has passed PDF Check"
Monday, April 30, 2007
Sunday, April 29, 2007
WTH
SB= stupid bitches, from a particular college that is not on the US News Top Colleges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fibji: Man, I realized no matter how annoying our UGs are, there are UGs outside who are infinitely more annoying. So we should be thankful that we don't have to teach students like that.
ttw: I think you will end up throwing things at them.
Fibji: YEAH.
(ed ttw: i have no idea why this is roadkill. presumably their intelligence level is similar.)
Saturday, April 28, 2007
Can someone summarize this into 3 sentences?
N-A-R
You are an N-A-R: a metaphysical Non-Reductionist, an epistemological Absolutist, and a moral Relativist. If you are simply dying inside to figure out what all this mumbo-jumbo means, then simply continue reading.
Metaphysics: Non-Reductionism (Idealism or Realism) In metaphysics, my test measures your tendency towards Reductionism or Non-Reductionism. As a Non-Reductionist, you recognize that reality is not necessarily simple or unified, and you thus tend to produce a robust ontology instead of carelessly shaving away hypothetical entities that reflect our philosophical experiences. My test recognizes two types of Non-Reductionists: Idealists and Realists.
1. Idealists believe that reality is fundamentally unknowable. All we can ever know is the world of sense experience, thought, and other phenomena which are only distorted reflections of an ultimate (or noumenal) reality. Kant, one of the most significant philosophers in history, theorized that human beings perceive reality in such a way that they impose their own mental frameworks and categories upon reality, fully distorting it. Reality for Kant is unconceptualized and not subject to any of the categories our minds apply to it. Idealists are non-reductionists because they recognize that the distinction between phenomenal reality and ultimate reality cannot be so easily discarded or unified into a single reality. They are separate and distinct, and there is no reason to suppose the one mirrors the other. Major philosophical idealists include Kant and Fichte.
If your views are different from the above, then you may be a Realist. 2. Realists deny the validity of sloppy metaphysical reductions, because they feel that there is no reason to suspect that reality reflects principles of parsimony or simplicity. Realism is the most common-sensical of the metaphysical views. It doesn't see reality as a unity or as reducible to matter or mind, nor does it see reality as divided into a phenomenal world of experience and an unknowable noumenal world of things-in-themselves. Realist metaphysics emphasizes that reality is for the most part composed of the things we observe and think. On the question of the existence of universals, for instance, a realist will assert that while universals do not physically exist, the relations they describe in particulars are as real as the particular things themselves, giving universals a type of reality. Thus, no reduction is made. On the mind-body problem, realists tend to believe that minds and bodies both exist, and the philosophical problems involved in reducing mind to matter or matter to mind are too great to warrant such a reduction. Finally, realists deny that reality is ultimately a Unity or Absolute, though they recognize that reality can be viewed as a Unity when we consider the real relations between the parts as constituting this unity--but it doesn't mean that the world isn't also made up of particular things. Aristotle and Popper are famous realists.
*****
Epistemology: Absolutism (Rationalism or Pragmatism) My test measures one's tendency towards Absolutism or Skepticism in regards to epistemology. As an Absolutist, you believe that objective knowledge is possible given the right approach, and you deny the claims of skeptical philosophers who insist that we can never have knowledge of ultimate reality. The two types of Absolutists recognized by my test are Rationalists and Pragmatists.
1. Rationalists believe that the use of reason ultimately provides the best route to truth. A rationalist usually defines truth as a correspondence between propositions and reality, taking the common-sense route. Also, rationalists tend to believe that knowledge of reality is made possible through certain foundational beliefs. This stance is known as foundationalism. A foundationalist believes that, because we cannot justify the truth of every statement in an infinite regress, we ultimately reach a foundation of knowledge. This foundation is composed of a priori truths, like mathematics and logic, as well as undoubtable truths like one's belief in his or her own existence. The belief that experiences and memories are veridical is also part of the foundation. Thus, for a rationalist knowledge of reality is made possible through our foundational beliefs, which we do not need to justify because we find them to be undoubtable and self-evident. In regards to science, a rationalist will tend to emphasize the foundational assumptions of scientific inquiry as prior to and more important than scientific inquiry itself. If science does lead to truth, it is only because it is based upon the assumption of certain rational principles such as "Every event is caused" and "The future will resemble the past". Philosophy has a wide representation of philosophical rationalists--Descartes, Spinoza, Liebniz, and many others.
If that didn't sound like your own views, then you are most likely the other type of Absolutist: the Pragmatist. Epistemological Pragmatists are fundamentally identified by their definition of truth. Truth is, on this view, merely a measure of a proposition's success in inquiry. This view is a strictly scientific notion of truth. A proposition can be called true if it leads to successful predictions or coheres best with the observed facts about the world. Thus, for the pragmatist, knowledge of reality is possible through scientific reasoning. A pragmatist emphasizes man's fallibility, and hence takes baby-steps towards knowledge through scientific methodology. Any truth claim for a pragmatist is open to revision and subject to change--if empirical observations lead us to call even logical rules into question (like quantum physics has done for the law of the excluded middle), then we can and should abandon even these supposed a priori and "absolutely certain" logical rules if they do not accord with our testing and refuting of our various propositions. As a consequence of this, a pragmatist doesn't feel that scientific knowledge is based upon unfounded assumptions that are taken to be true without any sort of justification--rather, they believe that the successes of scientific inquiry have proved that its assumptions are well-founded. For instance, the assumption of science that the future will be like the past is adequately shown by the amazing success of scientific theories in predicting future events--how else could this be possible unless the assumption were true? Pragmatism borrows elements from realism and yet attempts to account for the critiques made by skeptics and relativists. It is essentially a type of philosophical opportunism--it borrows the best stances from a large number of philosophical systems and attempts to discard the problems of these systems by combining them with others. Famous pragmatists of this type are Peirce and Dewey.
*****
Ethics: Relativism (Subjectivism or Emotivism) My test measures one's tendency towards moral Objectivism or moral Relativism in regards to ethics. As a moral Relativist, you tend to see moral choices as describing a subject's reaction to a moral object or situation, and not as a property of the moral object itself. You may also feel that moral words are meaningless because they do not address any empirical fact about the world. My test recognizes two types of moral relativists--Subjectivists and Emotivists.
1. Subjectivists see individual or collective desires as defining a situation's or object's moral worth. Thus, the subject, not the object itself, determines the value. Subjectivists recognize that social rules, customs, and morality have been wide-ranging and quite varied throughout history among various cultures. As a result, Subjectivism doesn't attempt to issue hard and fast rules for judging the moral worth of things. Instead, it recognizes that what we consider "good" and "right" is not bound by any discernable rule. There is no one trait that makes an act good or right, because so many different kinds of things have been called good and right. In regards to the definition of "good" or "right", a Subjectivist will tend to define it as whatever a particular person or group of people desire. They do not define it merely as "happiness" or "pleasure", for instance, because sometimes we desire to do things that do not produce pleasure, and because we don't consider all pleasurable things good. Furthermore, Subjectivists recognize the validity of consequentialism in that sometimes we refer to consequences as good and bad--but they also recognize that our intentions behind an action, or the means to the end, can also determine an act's moral worth. Again, there is no one rule to determine these things. Hence the relativism of moral Subjectivism. The most well-known of the subjectivists is Nietzsche.
If that didn't sound like your position, then you are probably the other variety of moral Relativist--the Emotivist. Emotivists are moral Relativists only in a very slanted sense, because they actually deny that words about morality have any meaning at all. An Emotivist would probably accept Hume's argument that it is impossible to derive an "ought" from an "is"--no factual state of affairs can logically entail any sort of moral action. Furthermore, a emotivist's emphasis on scientific (and hence empirical) verification and testing quickly leads to the conclusion that concepts such as "good" and "right" don't really describe any real qualities or relations. Science is never concerned with whether a particular state of affairs is moral or right or good--and an emotivist feels much the same way. Morality is thus neither objective or subjective for the emotivist--it is without any meaning at all, a sort of vague ontological fiction that is merely a symbol for our emotional responses to certain events. Famous emotivists include Ayer and other positivists associated with the Vienna Circle.
*****
As you can see, when your philosophical position is narrowed down there are so many potential categories that an OKCupid test cannot account for them all. But, taken as very broad categories or philosophical styles, you are best characterized as an N-A-R. Your exact philosophical opposite would be an R-S-O.
About the Author
Saint_gasoline is a crazed madman who spends all of his time writing OKCupid tests and ranting about philosophy and science. If you are interested in reading more of his insane ramblings, or seeing his deliciously trite webcomic, go to SaintGasoline.com.
My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
You scored higher than 99% on Metaphysics
You scored higher than 99% on Epistemology
You scored higher than 99% on Ethics
Friday, April 27, 2007
Thursday, April 26, 2007
Cerumen
Wednesday, April 25, 2007
Monday, April 23, 2007
Benji outdoors
Bibji says, "I think they think he's a lamb..." on Benji and the big dogs.
Friday, April 20, 2007
What College Major Are You/Should You Be?
It's a tie! | |
![]() | Your major should be part Engineering. Logic is your friend. With enough work, you can find a solution to anything... Unless it involves dating or parties. |
![]() | Your major should be part Computer Science. You like nothing more than spending long nights with friends in the computer lab... which is a good thing since that's exactly how you'll spend the next couple years. |
Thursday, April 19, 2007
@_@
The goat's owner, Mr Alifi, said he surprised the man with his goat and took him to a council of elders.
They ordered the man, Mr Tombe, to pay a dowry of 15,000 Sudanese dinars ($50) to Mr Alifi.
"We have given him the goat, and as far as we know they are still together," Mr Alifi said.
"When I asked him: 'What are you doing there?', he fell off the back of the goat, so I captured and tied him up."
Mr Alifi then called elders to decide how to deal with the case.
"They said I should not take him to the police, but rather let him pay a dowry for my goat because he used it as his wife," Mr Alifi told the newspaper.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/world/africa/4748292.stm
Published: 2006/02/24 16:40:00 GMT
© BBC MMVII
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
Tuesday, April 17, 2007
Monday, April 16, 2007
After the deadline has passed
B: me nothing. bumming, watsup
A: nuthing. bored
B: come lets play something
B: lets play hopscotch
A: .........................................
On the Corrs
A: so hooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooot. i like the drummer the most :D
B: oh. so young! the drummer is the least hot of the sisters
A: no no lah
B: YEAHHH
A: she is quite hot
B: the other two are HOTTTER, especially andrea corr
A: they are girly girly hotter, but this one is hottttt
B: like that, you might as well say, the brother HOTTEST. hurhur
A: the bitchy dominant kind
A: hahahah :P ass
B: oh no, you secretly wants to be whipped. hurhur
Friday, April 13, 2007
[16:36] Fibji: :-O :-O
[16:37] : "Above all the reasons I stated, the real reason for my support for my government is that God is the one who appointed these leaders. God placed them over us. By supporting them, we are obeying God".
it is not God who appointed the *** lah
hello
in anycase is it in the bible
there is you and God
and no one in between who can have the authortiy of God over you
[16:38] deaf when yawning: oh oyu haven't seen that one b4
[16:38] deaf when yawning: haha
[16:38] Fibji: seriously
I wonder if these christians have ever read the bible
maybe she ic catholic
and see *** like the men in white too
like the pop
[16:39] deaf when yawning: -_-
[16:39] Fibji : look
it is clear in the bible
that it is only between you and God
what is this of God placing leaders over you
man
I think I am more chrisitan than him/her/it
man
this guy should be gang raped on the sts
and then say
I was gang raped becos God gave me a test
like abaham or what what
maybe she/he see the *** like they are our savor
like moses leading the jews out of egypt, part the red sea and into the promised land
maybe he has those weed candles.. and then helocinate
that it is a burning bush
how you speel he-lu-si-nate?
haclluinate
[16:46] deaf when yawning: hallucinate
[16:46] deaf when yawning: -_-
Thursday, April 12, 2007
When the deadline REALLY approaches,
Wednesday, April 11, 2007
how to mis-read book titles...
"Nuclear environments?!?!" (Nuclear envelope; the cell, not the energy)
"Basic stem cells?!?!" (Brain stem cells)
Sigh, modeling people.
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
When a deadline approaches,
As a labmate puts it aptly, "I think I only had sugar for the entire day."
Friday, April 6, 2007
Cheap Bastard
A: Excuse me, sorry to disturb. I have a question about joining Society of Super Cool People (SSCP)
B: Yes, go ahead. What is the question.
A: I found that SSCP membership is not free and I want to join.
B: Erm yeah, it is $30 per year for student membership. So?
A: Yes, I am wondering about that. Is there any promotional coupon that you know for this?
B: .......................................................
and you know you are surrounded by other SDCB when you get suggestions like these from your friends:
From C:
you should have said "You mean you didn't check Amazon? Sometimes they have specials!"
"free shipping too"
"Occasionally fatwallet has deals on these things too"
"Sometimes it's free, you just have to sign up to evaluate some of their advertising"
From D:
ask him to go search on halfmania for half priced membership
From E:
tell him to search on edealinfo and as the search is very complex, you don't know
Thursday, April 5, 2007
Paper Paper!
A: i have decided that i am not going to ever co-author my papers with more than 1 co-author
B: meaning?
A: meaning me + one more author.. thats it
B: so if I want to write a paper with you
B: I will have to kill The Boss first?
B: *in case this IM is being hacked, the previous statement is meant to be a joke*
Tuesday, April 3, 2007
-__-
B: BENJI!?
A: NOT BENJI LAH
HELLLLO
MY FRIEND'S SON
NOT MY SISTER'S DOG
-__-
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
William Thomson, Lord Kelvin, Popular Lectures and Addresses [1891-1894]
Thursday, March 22, 2007
Genealogy
Shankar Sastry
Charles A. Desoer
Robert Mario Fano
Ernst Adolph Guillemin
Arnold Johannes Wilhelm Sommerfeld
C. L. Ferdinand (Carl Louis) Lindemann
C. Felix (Christian) Klein -> a)
----------------------------
a) Julius Plücker
Christian Ludwig Gerling
Carl Friedrich Gauß
Johann Friedrich Pfaff
Abraham Gotthelf Kaestner
Christian August Hausen
Johann Christoph Wichmannshausen
Otto Mencke ->END
------------------------------
a) Rudolf Otto Sigismund Lipschitz ->b)
---------------------------------
b) Martin Ohm
Karl Christian von Langsdorf
--------------------------------
b) Gustav Peter Lejeune Dirichlet ->c)
--------------------------------
c) Jean-Baptiste Joseph Fourier
c) Simeon Denis Poisson
Joseph Louis Lagrange
Leonhard Euler
Johann Bernoulli
Jacob Bernoulli
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Erhard Weigel ->END
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Friday, March 16, 2007
Thursday, March 15, 2007
One was a bird and the other was a bunny. They were run over by vehicles and were lying in the middle of the road.
The bird was just squashed, but the bunny had been eviscerated and lying in a red smear.
At least I didn't run over them. But I hope someone picks them up soon.

















